With green flyovers and florescent foot over bridges Chennai is definitely one of the more colorful cities around. But watching the rainbow colors coming alive and marching down its beaches in full strength was a bit of an over dose even for its standards.
If there was a Nobel prize for being conservative the intellectual capital of
It was the band of reluctant joggers thrown out of their beds by their ruthless moms/wives (different variants of the same problem) on a Sunday morning who were on the first line of fire. Men and woman who grew up on a staple of Indian cinema romance (or the lack of it) coupled with moral science lectures on how you could not cuddle or hold hands with even your spouse in public were greeted with the sight of lip locking man couples and cuddly female ones boldly showcasing their sexual disorientation. Cross dressed men and manly woman painted themselves in rainbow colors (as though they were already not horrifying enough) and held placards to make a statement on their right to do what they do and still be part of civil society.
The Rainbow pride march that set off from the shores of
Meanwhile the forever starved media rose in jubilation for having found the story of the season and The NEWS spread like wild fire and set off a series of events that activated the dead spirits of the argumentative Indian like nothing before and triggered a domino effect that culminated in a political hot potato for the newly elected government. Overnight India was elevated to a state that I like calling ‘the Rainbow nation’ and the LGBT community had become the mango man (aam admi) of the season.
Even the otherwise fragile secular fabric of India seems to develop strong bonds in moments of perceived national exigency. Amar, Akbar and Anthony made their faithful co-appearance on national television and even brought Banta Singh along for company this time to demonstrate their unity in adversity. “This is against all our faiths and the holey spirit!” they sang in unisonJ. Baba Namdev and a battery of other CEOs of Hindu Inc enterprises cried foul for going against the Art of loving. Some even went a step ahead and prescribed medicines and oil therapies for the alleged patients.
In this case there were two such events. The first being Dr Baba Namdev – the psychotherapist’s antics. It is agreeable that the sudden disorientation is more a state of the mind than a realistic way of life that it is being made out to be and logically one should be able to meditate and reorient his way out of the situation. But this may be acceptable to our intelligentsia if a scientist winning the Nobel Prize for medicine suggested it in his acceptance speech. Anything coming from baba’s and bawa’s is meant to be ridiculed and considered antagonistic to common sense and is therefore given the welcome of a uncommon nonsense. The artificial intelligentsia arrives out of nowhere rubbing their hands in glee to punch as many holes as they could in the Sadhu’s enterprising explanation of the subject.
This whole spirituality vs morality in the laboratory thingy goes on for sometime. Talk shows and social debate programs play out to packed galleries. Of them all, the most ridiculous one was the show on which the anchor thundered “Who decides what is natural and what is not moral?” well.. maam.. Nature decides what is natural and perhaps each individual should decide for oneself on what is moral. Her’s may well be a great argument and excellent prime time material but please for gay’s sake get real. These people may definitely help make your beach colorful on a random Sunday but they definitely wouldn’t help in the endurance of the human race or fit anywhere in its social setup. They are an exclamation mark followed by a full stop on the family tree. Spare a moment to think of what the world might have looked like if Adam and Eve went on a rainbow parade after biting the forbidden apple! Funny people really J
The second event was perhaps the more significant one. The Supreme court’s ruling against article 370 (the lone anti rainbow law in the world’s longest constitution) was received with a standing ovation. The law obviously doesn’t say “catch the gay and hang him by the pole until dead”. It simply is a legal prohibition on perpetuating the idea of homosexuality on unwilling individuals. And the judgment was against an attempt to misuse the provision. Consensual relationships between adults perhaps would never reach the public domain let alone being convicted or reprimanded and that is precisely the way it should be. Mumbai has always been home to a much larger LGBT community than London and Paris put together. But this has always remained outside the public discourse. Even the thriving morality and culture police of the city have largely ignored them and these men and woman have carved a space for themselves in this exhaustively diverse society to live in peace and tranquility. It is best left this way. Parading them into public space or scrapping laws in their honor is not going to help the cause in anyway.
Lets get it straight - Alexander may have been The Great gay, Elton john might well be the singing gay and MJ may have been neither or a bit of both, yet there is nothing glorious or poetic in being one. It is merely another complex manifestation of the confounded human mind which has shown over years its ability to stoop down to dingier lows. It may certainly be a complex state of being but there has never been a need to glamorize or dramatize it. Any attempt to do so would only pave the way for even more outrageous ideas that are now creeping into the grey fringes of society to follow suit and claim mainstream space. It is important to understand that we today are what we are as a result of the metaphysical combination of what we want to be and what the world wants us to be. And it is often the latter factor that ensures the end product remains more or less human and it is absolutely critical to ensure these checks and counter balances in society remain, after all man is the ultimate wild animal.
Well that reminds me, there is these days a clan emerging as a distant cousin of the rainbow people who have taken the adventure to an all new level by daring to venture beyond the human race. At this rate the day may not be far off when taking your dog for a morning walk might qualify for a speed date and MNS volunteers would celebrate Valentine ’s Day vandalizing the offices of Blue cross and PETA(People for Erotic treatment of Animals) for a change!
(c) Copyrights reserved.
8 comments:
nice post..however u lost track midway..u cud ve gone deep n analyzed their psyche..it was more of a critic speaking rather than some insighted analysis..u got carried away with the media thin i suppose..anyways..the ending was ansarish though:):)
write more da
Good and on-your-face post. lost track a lil inbetween but tats ok.. :-)
btw, u seem to be treading a very thin line of being homophobic! are u? take care u dont get branded as 'moral police'!
Liked the last few lines!! very very logical n close to possible! :-)
Good read Bhai!
Thanks for the read..!!
homophobic - Not really, believe in their right for invisible existence !!
hahahhah! i second venky! the ending was so so ansarish:)
nicey!
n finally i managed 2 read it
Of the listed ones.. OMR stands the best.. nice post!!
keep them coming more on the current trends IPL Fizz...or the scandalous God men ...
waiting to hear
Ansar,
Article 377 is I believe what you were referring to, not 370.
This is what it says, I believe.
" Section 377. Unnatural offences
Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with 1[imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description for term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
" - http://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/indianpenalcode/s377.htm
This seems to be a rather stern admonition for being homosexual, and so not what you mention - " It simply is a legal prohibition on perpetuating the idea of homosexuality on unwilling individuals. " This is a law that doesn't hold good anymore, for it has been experientially and scientifically (to a large extent) suggested that homosexuality is indeed a natural intent. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality
I for one believe that homosexuals should in fact be out of their closets. IMHO, this is quite similar to the struggle for rights by any other group segregated upon. If the blacks had never struggled, they would still be thought of as slaves and not natural equals. It is only sensible to create a social structure that is accepting of something that is as natural as being black or coloured or handicapped. Capping homosexuality under the pretext that it would fuel further the 'degradation' of society is as stupid as curbing the rights of black/handicapped people as one is afraid of non-black people 'painting themselves in black' or normal people handicapping themselves to get 'quotas' and the like.
Thanks for sharing your views Prasad...
Well, you do have a point in saying the LGBT community has a right to equal existence and i don't deny that. All i'm saying is, we as a culture are not habituated to public exhibition of our sexuality to the extent seen from this community in recent times.
And it would indeed be unfair to compare homosexuality to being a black or handicapped simply because it being a psychological condition could get suppressed or promoted by the mere prevalence of the idea in society albeit its origin being natural.
p.s. certain facts may have simply been exaggerated for the sake of humor.
Ansar,
I didn't mean to say that one should 'encourage' LGBT behaviour in the society. However, I do indeed wish that it was not looked down upon. IMHO, consensual sex between adults should be their own business, the state should not intervene in the matter at all. If the state does intervene, then people should come out of their closets simply because it is correct to do so and rather dangerous to silently bear with the oppression.
Homosexuality is, in many cases, more than a psychological condition, its definitely not a condition in the sense of neurotic or psychotic behaviour, its not a disease to be cured.
It is my strong belief that a healthy society, like any individual, should not have secrets, that be about money, sex, god or whatever. Continued secrecy creates repression, prolonged repression only nurtures rot in the society. OTOH, if people are indeed transparent about every possible thing, there would simply be a lot less tension in the world.
Post a Comment